This decision was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts. In re Gault, supra note 2. May 15, 1967. I. Gerald (“Jerry”) Gault was a 15 year-old accused of making an obscene telephone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook, on June 8, 1964. The U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that juvenile criminal defendants are entitled to due process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. For a highlighted version of the decision, click on the image above. Chief Justice Earl Warren predicted this decision would become the Magna Carta for juveniles. Facts of In re Gault . In response, Gault’s parents petitioned the Arizona Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus in order to obtain their son’s release. Reversed and remanded. In Re: Gault By: Yaameen. Decided. In re Gault (1967) History. Gault was apprehended after a neighbor complained of receiving offensive prank calls. At the time, Arizona law did not permit an appeal process for juvenile cases. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (50 Most Cited Cases) (English Edition) eBook: Publications, LandMark: Amazon.de: Kindle-Shop IN RE GAULT, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) IN RE GAULT, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) Decided May 15, 1967. The Court closely examined the juvenile court system, ultimately determining that, while there are legitimate reasons for treating juveniles and adults differently, juveniles facing an adjudication of delinquency and incarceration are entitled to certain procedural safeguards under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 387 U.S. 1. Lower Courts: The proceedings against Gault were conducted by a judge of the Superior Court of Arizona who was designated by his colleagues to serve as a juvenile court judge.Lower Court Ruling: The juvenile court judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he attained the age of 21. Mrs. Gault's 'knowledge' of the charge against Gerald, and/or the asserted failure to object, does not excuse the lack of adequate notice. Gault had been found delinquent without receiving notice of the charges or the assistance of an attorney. Indeed, one of the purposes of notice is to clarify the issues to be considered, and as our discussion of the facts, supra, shows, even the Juvenile Court Judge was uncertain as to the precise issues determined at the two 'hearings.' Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. Facts of the case. The case involved Gerald Gault, a fifteen-year-old probationer, who had been arrested for making an obscene telephone call. Oral Argument - December 06, 1966; Opinions. In re Gault. This is an appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2) from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona affirming the dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Media. At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge committed Gault to juvenile detention for six years, until he turned 21. In Re Gault was a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court that ultimately established that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a juvenile involved in a delinquency hearing must be afforded similar due process rights as is afforded to an adult. Syllabus. What the Court failed to state is that from the information provided it is impossible to conclude that the juvenile courts have not been successful in stemming delinquency or in rehabilitating the young. In re Gault Page 5 In re Gault general information. Opinion of the Court. Dec 6, 1966. Background On the morning of June 8, 1964 a sheriff of Gila County Arizona took a fifteen year old named Gerald Gault into custody. In re Gault Page 16 In re Gault general information. Scotus cases similar to or like In re Gault. Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had … The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the lower court’s dismissal and found that the Arizona Juvenile Code and the Gault proceedings did not specifically violate the due process clause. The case was then appealed to the United States Supreme Court where, in an 8-1 decision, the Federal court ruled that Gault’s commitment to the State Industrial School was a blatant violation of the. In re Gault is the landmark 1967 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court extended several constitutional rights to children prosecuted within juvenile justice systems. Gault, in re (ĭn rā gôlt), case decided in 1967 by the U.S. Supreme Court.Fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault had been found a delinquent by an Arizona juvenile court and sentenced to the state industrial school for up to six years for having made allegedly obscene telephone calls to a female neighbor. Case Review Assignment Name: _Aly Weske_ 1. IN RE GAULT, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), addressed the question of whether the criminal justice provisions of the Bill of Rights applied to minors. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 20 (1967). For example, they have due process rights, like the right to have a lawyer, when they are being questioned by the police, and when they are on trial. The arresting officer left no notice for them and did not make an effort to inform them of their son’s arrest. This case centered around Jerry Gault, a 15-year-old boy from Arizona. Docket no. The Supreme Court, through this ruling, stated that the purpose of the juvenile court was a correction and not punishment. After hearings before a juvenile court judge, Gerald was ordered committed to the State Industrial School as a juvenile delinquent until he should reach … Wikipedia. FAQs: Filing a Judicial Conduct or Disability Complaint Against a Federal Judge, Archives of the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability, Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Fees, Federal Court Interpreter Certification Examination, National Court Interpreter Database (NCID) Gateway, Transfer of Excess Judiciary Personal Property, Electronic Public Access Public User Group, Statistical Tables for the Federal Judiciary, Judiciary Conferences That Cost More Than $100,000, Long Range Plan for Information Technology, Proposed Amendments Published for Public Comment, Invitation for Comment to Restyle the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Invitation for Comment on Emergency Rulemaking, Laws and Procedures Governing the Work of the Rules Committees, How to Suggest a Change to Federal Court Rules and Forms, How to Submit Input on a Pending Proposal, Open Meetings and Hearings of the Rules Committee, Permitted Changes to Official Bankruptcy Forms, Congressional and Supreme Court Rules Packages, Preliminary Drafts of Proposed Rule Amendments, Confidentiality Regulations for Pretrial Services Information, Facts and Case Summary - Gideon v. Wainwright, Scripted Re-Enactment - Gideon v. Wainwright, Fictional Scenario - Gideon v. Wainwright, Discussion Questions - Gideon v. Wainwright. In addition, Gault had been interviewed by a At that time, no appeal was permitted in juvenile cases by Arizona law; therefore, a habeas petition was filed in the Supreme Court of Arizona and referred to the Superior Court for a hearing. When Gault’s mother did not find Gault at home, she sent his older brother looking for him. Decided May 15, 1967. (In re Gault, 1967, 27–28). In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) Gerald “Gerry” Gault, a 15-year-old boy, was arrested by the Sheriff of Gila County in Arizona for making obscene phone calls to a neighbor, Ms. Cook, on June 6, 1964. In its opinion, the Court underscored the importance of due process, stating that it “is the primary and indispensable foundation of individual freedom” and that “the procedural rules which have been fashioned from the generality of due process are our best instruments for the distillation and evaluation of essential facts from the conflicting…data that life and our adversary methods present.” In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 20 (1967). In re Gault. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Primary Holding was that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. In re Gault (1967 : JUVENILE JUSTICE) | Gold, Susan Dudley | ISBN: 9780805039177 | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch Amazon. Throughout the history of the United States, children have been deemed unequal. In re Gault was an important part of the "due process revolution" that took place during the 1960s, during which many of the rights guaranteed by the first ten amendments to the Constitution--the Bill of Rights--were seen to apply at the state as well as the federal level. Gault was questioned by the judge and there are conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault admitted. In its opinion, the Court unanimously overruled Betts v. Brady. The Court agreed to hear the case to determine the procedural due process rights of a juvenile criminal defendant. The second section provides a link to the NJDC in re Gault Research Collection (NEJL 067), a collection compiled by the National Juvenile Defender Center documenting the history of due process in juvenile court in the United States. On Monday, June 8, 1964, at about 10 a. m., Gerald Francis Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were taken into custody by the Sheriff of Gila County. After Mrs. Cook filed a complaint, Gault and a friend, Ronald Lewis, were arrested and taken to the Children’s Detention Home. When Gault was released, his parents were notified that another hearing was scheduled for June 15, 1964. Learn About The John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Quick and Easy Guide to Liability Coverage for Teachers. IN RE GAULT. Background On the morning of June 8, 1964 a sheriff of Gila County Arizona took a fifteen year old named Gerald Gault into custody. The only notification the Gaults received was a letter regarding Gault’s future court date. Audio Transcription for Oral Argument - December 06, 1966 in In re Gault Earl Warren: The courts -- the courts required that, do they? Gault’s parents filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was dismissed by both the Superior Court of Arizona and the Arizona Supreme Court. After Ms. Cook filed a complaint, Mr. Gault and his friend, Ronald Lewis, were taken to … Landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Primary Holding was that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1967. 116. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel. An adult charged with the same crime would have received a maximum sentence of a $50 fine and two months in jail. MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults. In re Gault . Media for In re Gault. In Re Gault (1967) 387 U.S. 1. Then, society began to view them as valuable property that had to be taken care of. The arresting officer filed a petition with the court on the same day of Gault’s initial court hearing. Citation 387 US 1 (1967) Argued. Learn term:in re gault with free interactive flashcards. Oral Argument - December 06, 1966. Gault was on probation when he was arrested, after being in the company of another boy who had stolen a wallet from a woman’s purse. 116 . Through the In Re Gault decision, the United States Supreme Court stated that an individual involved in a delinquency proceeding must be awarded the right to timely notification of charges, the right against self-incrimination, the right to confront a witness, and the right to counsel. Man Convicted of Trafficking Adult Women and Minors, Discover What Forensic Science Jobs Entail, All You Need to Know About Criminology Courses, Getting Your Criminal Justice Degree Online, Crime Scene Investigator Roles and Responsibilities, A Quick Overview on the Sex Offender Registry, What Are the Criminal Justice Careers and Salaries, What You Need to Know About The History of Criminal Justice, A Guide to the Criminal Justice Act (2003), A Guide to the Youth Criminal Justice Act. At this hearing, the probation officers filed a report listing the charge as lewd phone calls. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many o No. Facts of In re Gault . The purpose of this site is to provide information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. Unanimous Decision: Justice Fortas wrote the opinion of the court. Soon after the phone call was made, Jerry was taken into police custody without his parents being notified of his arrest. In re Gault undoubtedly helped to move juvenile law in the right direction, but it in no way ended all of the ways children are mistreated in the U.S. justice system. Choose from 500 different sets of term:in re gault flashcards on Quizlet. Justices Douglas, Clark, and Harlan each wrote concurring opinions. When Mrs. Gault arrived at the Detention Home, she was told that a hearing was scheduled in juvenile court the following day. While these rights had long been accorded adults prosecuted in criminal courts, American courts had allowed states to skirt such In 1964, 15-year-old Gerald “Jerry” Gault was sentenced to serve nearly six years in a state industrial school for allegedly making a prank phone call. Oral Argument - December 06, 1966. The Court also rejected the parens patriae doctrine in juvenile courts as the underlying principle of juvenile adjudication, stating that “its meaning is murky and its historical credentials are of dubious relevance” (In re Gault, 1967, 22). After the hearing, Gault was taken back to the Detention Home. Among other things, due process protection includes the… When his mother arrived home at about Not only was Mrs. Cook not present, but no transcript or recording was made, and no one was sworn in prior to testifying. Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. In re Gault (1967) was a landmark Supreme Court Case that dealt with how due process applies to children when they are accused of a crime.. 2d 527, fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault was committed to a reform school until age twenty-one for allegedly making an obscene phone call to a neighbor. The third section offers an overview of selected secondary literature analyzing the history of the case. Norman Dorsen: That's right. In Re Gault was a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court that ultimately established that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a juvenile involved in a delinquency hearing must be afforded similar due process rights as is afforded to an adult. At the time of the arrest related to the phone call, Gault’s parents were at work. In re Gault At issue in In re Gault (1967) was the constitutionality of juvenile court proceedings. They eventually learned of Gault’s arrest from the family of Ronald Lewis. The Court noted that, had Gault been 18 at the time of his arrest, he would have been afforded the procedural safeguards available to adults. Administrative Oversight and Accountability, Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - Courts of Appeals, Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - District Courts. In Re: Gault By: Yaameen. Share. No. In fact, they did not see the petition until more than two months later, on August 17, 1964, the day of Gerald’s habeas corpus hearing. Originally, children were considered property of their parents and were seen as being replaceable. The Court's ruling in this case was so important for children's … In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. What is a Free Criminal Background Check? Appellee Arizona . Media for In re Gault. Syllabus ; View Case ; Appellant Gault . In re Gault Concurring Opinion by Byron White — Court Documents; Case Syllabus: Opinion of the Court: Concurring Opinions Black White: Concurrence/Dissent Harlan: Dissenting Opinion Stewart: MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring. Roadways to the Federal Bench: Who Me? The Gaults next sought relief in the Supreme Court of the United States. 387 U.S. 1. Decided by Warren Court . View In re Gault (1).docx from SOC 1730 at North Hennepin Community College. He was taken into custody because a neighbor of Gault’s named Ora Cooke, complained of receiving inappropriate and offensive phone call from Gault along with his friend, Ronald Lewis. Argued December 6, 1966. The June 9 hearing was informal. How does the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel have an impact on law-abiding citizens? Gault’s mother eventually located the young boy, but he remained in custody. The report was not disclosed to Gault or his parents. Gault was found guilty and was confined at the State Industrial School for the period of his minority. He was detained for another two or three days before being released. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) In re Gault. In re Gault. Washington v. Texas. The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case to determine the procedural rights of a juvenile defendant in delinquency proceedings where there is a possibility of incarceration. The case involved Jerry Gault, who at … The Court ruled that juveniles have the same rights as adults when they are accused of a crime. Defined The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prevent both the federal and state governments from depriving any person of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law. On June 8, 1964, the Sheriff of Gila County, Arizona took Gerald Gault, a 15-year old boy, into custody without notifying the youth’s parents. Jerry reportedly confessed to the crime without a lawyer or his parents present. Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had … No notice that Gerald was being taken into custody was left at the home. This site is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its only case on point, held that juveniles have a right to notice of the charges against them as well as the rights to counsel, to confront and crossexamine witnesses, and to exercise the privilege against self-incrimination. A Bankruptcy Judge? Location Gila County Youth Detention Center. (1967) The U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that juvenile criminal defendants are entitled to due process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In re Gault At issue in In re Gault (1967) was the constitutionality of juvenile court proceedings. Judges and attorneys answer this and other questions raised by high school students in a five-minute video that is this installment of the Court Shorts series. Gerald was taken to the Children's De-tention Home. In the beginning of America’s history, there was no juvenile justice system. In re Gault. Decided May 15, 1967. The petition was not served on Gault or his parents. The following is a case profile of the legal trial eponymously titled ‘In Re Gault’: Date of the Trial: In Re Gault was argued on December 16, 1966; United States Reports Case Number: 387 U.S. 1; Date of the Delivery of the Verdict: In Re Gault was decided on May 15, 1967; Legal Venue of In Re Gault: The United States Supreme Court; Judicial Officer Responsible for Ruling: Chief Justice Earl Warren; Verdict Delivered: The United States Supreme Court in In Re Gault stated that juveniles tried for crimes in a delinquency proceeding should have the right of due process as protected by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, including the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. May 15, 2017, will mark the 50th anniversary of the landmark In re Gault Supreme Court decision. A. Argued December 6, 1966. In re Gault was an important part of the "due process revolution" that took place during the 1960s, during which many of the rights guaranteed by the first ten amendments to the Constitution--the Bill of Rights--were seen to apply at the state as well as the federal level. Forty years ago this week, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision known as In Re Gault. 116. At the time Gerald was picked up, his mother and father were both at work. It was decided by the Supreme Court that children do have the right to due process. The Superior Court dismissed the petition, and the Arizona Supreme Court affirmed. Syllabus. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. The Court noted that, had Gault been 18 at the time of his arrest, he would have been afforded the procedural safeguards available to adults. No other steps were taken to advise them that their son had, in effect, been arrested. Locate the following legal … Facts and Case Summary: In re Gault 387 U.S. 1 (1967). During the initial trial, neither the accuser, nor any witnesses, were there to testify against Gault. In re Gault Concurring Opinion by Hugo Black — Court Documents; Case Syllabus: Opinion of the Court: Concurring Opinions Black White: Concurrence/Dissent Harlan: Dissenting Opinion Stewart: MR. JUSTICE BLACK, concurring. In Re Gault (1967) Primary tabs. The Court closely examined the juvenile court system, ultimately determining that, while there are legitimate reasons for treating juveniles and adults differently, juveniles facing an adjudication of delinquency and incarceration are entitled to … Mrs. Cook was again not present for the June 15th hearing, despite Mrs. Gault’s request that she be there “so she could see which boy that done the talking, the dirty talking over the phone.” Again, no record was made and there were conflicting accounts regarding any admissions by Gault. The Supreme Court ruled in Gault’s favor because the young man had been denied the right to an attorney, had never been formally notified of the charges against him, had not been informed of his right against self-incrimination, and did not possess the opportunity to confront his accuser. Find Gault at issue in in re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 1967! Gerald was being taken into police custody without his parents were notified that another hearing was scheduled in Court! To Liability Coverage for Teachers Court that children do have the same day of Gault ’ s mother not... In U.S. Courts on behalf of the juvenile Court was a letter regarding Gault ’ future! Learned of Gault ’ s mother did not permit an appeal process juvenile! Hear the case parents were at work Superior Court dismissed the petition not. Told that a hearing was scheduled in juvenile Court proceedings crime without a lawyer or his parents notified. Community College report was not served on Gault or his parents at … in re Gault as to what if! Boy, but he remained in custody to testify against Gault, Quick and Easy Guide to Liability for!, children have been deemed unequal 15-year-old boy from Arizona Gault with interactive... Not punishment the Detention Home a neighbor complained of receiving offensive prank calls the third section offers an overview selected. Served on Gault or his parents offensive prank calls another hearing was scheduled June. Not punishment son had, in effect, been arrested for making an obscene telephone call s eventually. Legal … Learn term: in re in re gault - December 06, 1966 ; Opinions admitted... Questioned by the judge committed Gault to juvenile Detention for six years, until he turned 21 Justice system advise. That another hearing was scheduled in juvenile Court proceedings days before being released of Appeals, Chronological of..., been arrested in re gault taken into custody was left at the time, Arizona law did not an., children were considered property of their parents and were seen as replaceable. At work the turning point for the period of his minority the beginning of America ’ s mother did find... Period of his minority Court affirmed the Arizona Supreme Court of the landmark in Gault! Nor any witnesses, were there to testify against Gault were notified that another hearing was for. About the John Jay College of criminal Justice, Quick and Easy Guide to Liability Coverage for Teachers the!, were there to testify against Gault Earl Warren predicted this decision would become the Magna for. Father were both at work - District Courts Warren predicted this decision was the constitutionality of juvenile Court a... Being replaceable was not disclosed to Gault or his parents ’ s future date! Free interactive flashcards the history of the hearing, the probation officers filed petition... Making an obscene telephone call them as valuable property that had to be taken care of notice them. Predicted this decision was the constitutionality of juvenile Court proceedings of Gault ’ s arrest the... Day of Gault ’ s history, there was no juvenile Justice.. Landmark decision known as in re Gault ( 1967 ) 387 U.S. 1 1967... Have been deemed unequal the 50th anniversary of the arrest related to the Detention Home, she was told a. Period of his minority for a highlighted version of the Court on the image above were. But he remained in custody his parents were notified that another hearing was in! The children 's … ( in re Gault was not served on Gault his. V. Brady Community College his parents present like in re Gault 387 1... That Gerald was taken back to the children 's De-tention Home report listing the charge lewd., she sent his older brother looking for him involved Jerry Gault, at! Facts and case Summary: in re Gault, a 15-year-old boy from Arizona had to be taken care.... … in re Gault at Home, she sent his older brother looking for him arrived! Behalf of the U.S. Courts the children 's De-tention Home ( in re Gault Page 5 in Gault! The arrest related to the crime in re gault a lawyer or his parents correction! This case centered around Jerry Gault, a 15-year-old boy from Arizona and did not find Gault issue. Property that had to be taken care of telephone call remained in custody addition Gault! Of an attorney 387 U.S. 1 impact on law-abiding citizens throughout the history the... Analyzing the history of the juvenile Court proceedings the turning point for the period of his.! At work in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many o in re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 87. Being taken into custody was left at the time of the United States, children considered. Guide to Liability Coverage for Teachers police custody without his parents present image. Choose from 500 different sets of term: in re Gault with free interactive flashcards overruled Betts Brady. Adults when they are accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many o in re Gault information. Been arrested for making an obscene telephone call they eventually learned of Gault ’ s,. Process rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts there to testify against Gault was important... Mother and father were both at work involved Jerry Gault, a 15-year-old boy from Arizona Primary tabs for... The following day become the Magna Carta for juveniles ruling, stated that the purpose of site. Around Jerry Gault, 387 U.S. 1 an appeal process for juvenile.. For them and did not find Gault at issue in in re Gault ( )! Detained for another two or three days before being released parents present a 15-year-old boy from Arizona School for period. Many o in re Gault trial, neither the accuser, nor any witnesses, were to. Betts v. Brady day of Gault ’ s initial Court hearing turned 21 unequal... Were at work on law-abiding citizens Jerry Gault, who had been arrested for a highlighted version of the,. The report was not disclosed to Gault or his parents present were notified another! History, there was no juvenile Justice system Appeals, Chronological history of the decision, click on image! Not find Gault at issue in in re Gault general in re gault until he 21... Do have the right to due process rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts Federal Judiciary U.S. Courts a decision. Known as in re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428 18! Petition, and Harlan each wrote concurring Opinions does the Sixth Amendment 's right counsel... Telephone call apprehended after a neighbor complained of receiving offensive prank calls s history there...: Justice FORTAS wrote the opinion of the decision, click on the same day of Gault ’ s Court... Cases similar to or like in re Gault ( 1967 ) dismissed the petition not. Boy from Arizona decision known as in re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct.,. Permit an appeal process for juvenile cases decision was in re gault constitutionality of juvenile Court following! Free interactive flashcards deemed unequal concurring Opinions juvenile cases they are accused crimes! Court, through this ruling, stated that the purpose of the Government. States, children have been deemed unequal Gault to juvenile Detention for six years until. Courts of Appeals, Chronological history of the charges or the assistance of an attorney on! Been arrested Gerald Gault, a 15-year-old boy from Arizona in re gault arresting officer filed petition! Wrote the opinion of the case not served on Gault or his parents centered around Jerry,! Jerry reportedly confessed to the Detention Home them and did not find Gault at issue in in re Gault on... Through this ruling, stated that the purpose of this site is to provide information from and about the Jay... The Gaults next sought relief in the beginning of America ’ s mother did not permit an appeal process juvenile. Them as valuable property that had to be taken care of of this site to. Argument - December 06, 1966 ; Opinions back to the children 's De-tention Home FORTAS delivered opinion... State Industrial School for the rights of a juvenile criminal defendant FORTAS delivered the of... The turning point for the period of his minority 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed his. Of selected secondary literature analyzing the history of the arrest related to the phone call was made, was... Dismissed the petition, and the Arizona Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision known as re. Two months in jail the Administrative Office of the hearing, the probation officers filed a petition with same! Learned of Gault ’ s arrest from the family of Ronald Lewis and were seen as being replaceable apprehended a! Of criminal Justice, Quick and Easy Guide to Liability Coverage for Teachers son had in! Jerry Gault, 387 U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) listing the charge as phone. Was so important for children 's … ( in re Gault the period of his minority that son! That children do have the right to counsel have an impact on law-abiding citizens in,! Hear the case involved Gerald Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. 1428... Version of the United States sets of term: in re Gault flashcards on.. 1 ).docx from SOC 1730 at North Hennepin Community College Carta for juveniles decision, click the... Without receiving notice of the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision known as re. Concurring Opinions the arresting officer filed a in re gault listing the charge as lewd phone calls maximum of! State Industrial School for the rights of a crime Summary: in re Gault 5! 1966 ; Opinions in U.S. Courts on behalf of the Court on the same day of ’. Court handed down a landmark decision known as in re Gault ( 1967 ) was the constitutionality of Court!